data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd09e/bd09eb35627d5e92f652232dcf6889e698eedbfa" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"
By temperament and training, Edward had always been partial to Normans, and often favoured them for the Kingdom's top jobs over Saxons; when he chose Robert of Jumièges for Archbishop of Canterbury, well, it's a good thing they didn't have Private Eye in those days, because it was the scandal of the age, seeing as it overrode the express wishes of his own powerful father-in-law, Godwin, Earl of Wessex.
In the end, the Witenagemot chose Harold Godwinson, a Saxon nobleman (Earl of Wessex since 1053, and brother of the Queen) who claimed he'd been promised the throne on Edward's death bed; this rankled the ire of the Duke of Normandy - a man still known as William the Bastard - who had by some means or other extracted the same promise from the feckless, if pious, King (either in 1052 when William visited London, or else in 1064, as a reward for rescuing Edward from a shipwreck).
Then there was a third claim, from King Harald III of Norway... All of which made 1066 a very turbulent year indeed.
*
share on: facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment